See where Austin is building—before the market catches up.

Permitting activity across 1,047 unique permits (last 7 days) shows broad-based but uneven development intensity across Austin ZIP codes. Valuation reporting quality is weak market-wide: the large majority of ZIPs are flagged "suspect" or "unreported" for valuation data, with only 78726 and 78735 rated "reported." Any dollar-based investment conclusions should be treated with caution given this gap.

Development permitting (new construction + major redevelopment, excluding routine maintenance) is concentrated in southeast/east Austin: 78744, 78754, 78704, 78702, and 78617 lead in raw development-permit volume. New-construction share (share of permits that are new builds) is highest in outer/east ZIPs (78653, 78652, 78747 at 100%; 78754, 78617, 78753 near/above 90%), while central/west ZIPs (78701, 78758, 78729, 78735, 78717, 78752) show 0–10% new-construction share, consistent with a built-out, redevelopment/maintenance-dominated profile.

Data quality flag: ZIP 78753 reports new_units = 312 against only 14 new-construction permits reporting units (new_units_reported_permits = 14) and affected_units_all_permits = 321. This is a significant outlier versus per-permit unit counts elsewhere and should be treated as an unverified/likely data-entry anomaly rather than a confirmed large multifamily wave — flagged to watchlist rather than used as a headline signal. Similarly, 78752 shows affected_units_all_permits = 307 despite zero new construction permits, indicating this affected-units figure reflects existing-building unit counts on redevelopment/maintenance permits, not new supply (per rules, this figure is never treated as new units).

78754 and 78617 stand out as new-construction-driven growth ZIPs with reasonably consistent (mixed) valuation reporting. 78702, 78745, and 78703 skew heavily toward major redevelopment rather than ground-up new construction, suggesting infill/renovation activity in already-developed core neighborhoods.

18 zoning/neighborhood-planning cases are active. Notable items:

• Springdale Road & E. MLK Multifamily Rezoning (C14-2026-0052) — SF-6 to MF-4, 17.076 acres, Scheduled for Hearing — a multifamily upzoning in 78723, paired with a Restrictive Covenant termination case on the same corridor.
• TownLake YMCA PUD (C814-2026-0001) — LI-CO-NP to PUD-NP, 4.8 acres in 78703, In Review.
• Park 290 Logistics Center (C14-2026-0054) — CH-CO to LI, 66.27 acres in 78724, In Review — large industrial/logistics rezoning.
• Several small-scale LO→LR commercial rezonings (Kassa Commercial, Menchaca, W 35th) suggest continued light-commercial infill pressure in 78753, 78704, and 78703.
• One case (2710 Manor Road FLUM Amendment) was Cancelled.

No zoning case includes a specified unit count; these are rezoning entitlement changes only and do not represent confirmed new construction.

• 78753 unit-count anomaly: new_units (312) far exceeds new_units_reported_permits (14); requires source verification before treating as a demand/supply signal.
• 78752 affected-units outlier: 307 affected units on permits with zero new construction — reflects existing structures under redevelopment/maintenance, not new supply.
• Valuation reporting gaps: Majority of ZIPs show 0 reported valuation permits despite double-digit total permits (e.g., 78744, 78704, 78745, 78703, 78757, 78731, 78746) — limits ability to assess investment dollar volume.
• 78701 and 78758: Large "other_count" (14) and "unreported" valuation quality — permit classification and cost data both weak here.